Posts Tagged ‘bottom line leadership’

Know Where and How to Improve Results

Monday, August 16th, 2010

Recently, I had the opportunity to hear Rudolph Giuliani speak about his experience as the Mayor of New York City during the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 and what he has been doing since that time.  I particularly enjoyed hearing about his experience as a mayor and the lessons he learned and now applies them in his life.

Mr. Giuliani spoke about how he was able to reduce the crime rate in New York City.  Mr. Giuliani said, “Tracking and finding the areas that need improvement is the first step.”  He implemented a system for tracking where, what time, and what type of crimes were occurring in the city.  Using this data he was able to identify the areas where more law enforcement was needed and know what time of the day demanded the largest number of law enforcement personnel in the city.    Through having the right number of law enforcement personnel in the right areas, at the right time, he was able to reduce the crime rate in New York City by 60-70%.  New York City is now considered to be one of the safest large cities in the United States.

Mr. Giuliani then spoke about how he was able to decrease the number of people in NYC on welfare.   He began by looking at how the case workers were being compensated for their work.  He found the case workers for many years were being paid according to the number of welfare clients they had.  Therefore, it was more lucrative for the case workers to have people remain on welfare.  He decided to make a change and pay based on the number of jobs the case worker helped find for their welfare clients.  Through this change, in a span of 4 years, the number of people on welfare decreased from 1.1 million to 550,000.  A decrease of 50%!   This improvement in saving the tax payers tens of millions of dollars.

City_New_York_16662218_XSMany times businesses “leave” money on the table because they are working ineffectively, like the New York City was with law enforcement, by not knowing where their people should be and when they should be there.  Often they are scared to make some of the simple changes because they have been working the same way for so long, just like the case workers in NYC who were being paid and incentivized to keep their clients on welfare.   What if your employees tracked the information that made them successful?  What if they not only tracked the information, but understood and used the information as feedback to identify what they could change to be more successful?  What if your employees were compensated, motivated, and/or driven to do those things that would add to the bottom line profits of the business?  What would be the increase in profits?  What would be the decrease in costs and spending?

Bottom Line Leadership is specifically designed to address these questions.  It is created to have immediate and long-term positive influence on the bottom line profits of your business.  It will increase motivation in your employees by helping them answer the question, “What is it that I do, what do I get paid for?”  It will offer the leadership in your organization a better understanding and utilization of key fundamental leadership skills to drive the changes.  This program is a “game changing” business solution and for some companies an overall intervention.  It has been so successful in providing a Return on Investment that it is guaranteed to pay for itself by the time the program is done.  You truly have nothing to lose!

Who Is Holding Back Your Business?

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Box with Arrows_thumbnailYour people drive your business. Most have the best of intentions when it comes to making a solid contribution to the overall success of the enterprise. They do good work so you give them more work to do. They were your best account rep, your best payables clerk, best welder or project engineer so you made them leaders of people. The problem is that these outstanding individuals have neither the experience nor the training to be outstanding leaders, leaving them ill prepared for the job that they didn’t sign on for in the first place.

Take John for example. John recently became the team leader of 14 people who are responsible for $1,000,000 in production. Doing their very best, John’s team delivers 90% of the million dollar production budget. Managing by instinct, John tends to avoid conflict, uses the relationships with his former co-workers to emotionally bribe them into doing additional work, and measures success in the number of days passed where John manages to fly below the radar of the management team. John deserves better. He needs to be given the tools needed to do his job well. A small investment in his bottom line leadership skills will have a two-fold return: A gift to John that will last a lifetime and the opportunity for you to close your $100,000 budget shortfall.

Who’s holding you back? Who, not what, is standing in the way of your initiatives to increase sales, cut operating expenses and learn how to increase profit margins across the board? There is a John in your organization. He deserves a chance to succeed and continue to grow his contribution to the organization. An investment in John is not just an investment in John; he has 14 people reporting to him and they will also reap the benefits of his development. As John becomes a better leader we create the culture that will meet the demands of your business tomorrow and build ownership and commitment in the next group of potential leaders.

Do you think it’s too hard to find the time? Too hard to find the money? Stop for a moment and do the math. Can you really afford not to?

The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Interview with Ted Zimmerman on Bottom Line Leadership
In 1981 I had the honor of interviewing Ted Zimmerman. You might have a similar reaction to hearing the name as I did when I first heard it, because I had never heard of Ted Zimmerman. As a teenager Ted had been a clerk in the first self-service grocery store in America. Although there has been an unresolved debate concerning when the first self-service store actually opened, and by whom, I will go with the Safeway claim of being first, with Ted Zimmerman working as a clerk in that store on grand opening day.
 
S.M. Skaggs opened the store in early June 1915 in American Falls, Idaho, and within months sold the store to M.B. Skaggs, one of his six sons. Neither Ted, nor any other witness can pinpoint the date any closer than, “early June.” Prior to the advent of self-service, clerks assembled product orders from a customer provided list. But everything changed on that grand opening day in June 1915 and I was given the privilege of interviewing an elderly gentleman who was a personal witness to that historical event.
 
The reason for the interview was that Ted Zimmerman was in declining health and it appeared that his story might go forgotten and untold if it wasn’t documented. On the day of the interview near Tacoma, Washington Ted was in good spirits and seemed eager to have his participation in history documented.
 
After a few cordial preliminaries, I asked, “Is it true that on the first day a cigar box was used as a cash register?” Smiling, Ted said, “Yes, we couldn’t afford a real register for some time. In those early days a cigar box was all we had and it worked just fine, even as we opened more stores.” So the rumor I had heard about a cigar box was true.

Measuring Success 
Later in the interview I asked, “In the store’s early days how did the Skaggs brothers measure results or success?” Ted’s response was simple. He said, “At the end of each day we counted the cash in the cigar box and entered the total in a ledger we used to keep track of our sales. It was cash only in those days, because there were no checks or credit cards. That meant our sales for a day was the cash we had in the cigar box at closing time.”
 
Ted explained more about the ledger, “We kept track of daily sales in one column and added the days of the week into a weekly total in the next column. The weekly totals then added up to a monthly total, and so forth.”
 
I asked, “What other measurements were used in the early stores?” He said, “It didn’t take long to learn that when an owner isn’t managing the store that labor cost can get out of hand. So we divided the weekly labor cost in dollars, by the weekly sales dollars and called it Labor Percent. It was easy to know your labor dollars, because we paid the help in cash right out of the cigar box each Friday.”
I continued, “How was Labor Percent used to manage a store?”
He explained, “We figured out Labor Percent benchmarks so we could tell within a week or so if a manager was using too much labor. As you can suspect, there wasn’t much of a problem with a manager using too little labor. Figuring Labor Percent each week gave us an easy way to look at the biggest controllable expense we had.”

Overall Gross Margin
Ted described another bottom line measurement used in those early stores. He continued, “At first we kind of stumbled onto things as we opened new stores. By knowing our sales for a period of time, what it cost to purchase the products we sold, and how much inventory we had on hand, we could figure out an overall gross margin percent for the store. That made it possible for us to help a manager whose gross might be lower than other stores. If a gross was low it meant that something was wrong. It gave us something to look at and work on.”
 
My next question was, “How long did it take for the company to develop a Profit and Loss Statement?”
 
Ted wasn’t sure about the answer, but clarified, “I know it wasn’t for a while, because none of us had much accounting background. But after a while I think it was a bookkeeper that started to make them. When we got used to them, they came out every few months. Then, when the company got bigger the P&Ls came out each month.”
 
Measurements for Success
I summarized to Ted, “So what you are telling me is that the primary measurements for success in the early days of self-service grocery were:

1.  Sales Per Week,
2.  Labor Percent Per Week
3. Store Gross Profit Percent After An Inventory
4. A monthly Profit and Loss Statement.

Is that correct?” Thinking for a minute he said, “That’s about it and it worked pretty good for us in those days.”

Having heard this piece of history, consider this: “What has changed in measuring bottom line results or success in the grocery industry from 1915 until today?” The answer is: the cigar box, and not much else. That’s why, “The more things change, the more they stay the same.” The sad truth is that almost all retail stores today function with the same four primary measurements that were used almost a century ago. With the unbelievably sophisticated POS systems, scanning, computers, and expensive software, can’t we do any better than what Ted and his colleagues did so long ago?

Consider the cost of an empty cigar box and ledger, compared to the cost of today’s highly computerized POS systems. If Ted and the Skaggs brothers could get four critical measurements out of a cigar box, how much valuable information should we get and use from a POS system that can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars?
 
How well do you use the information supplied by your POS and accounting systems? Is your organization’s bottom line leadership and measurement strategies stuck in 1915, or have they progressed beyond the four standard measurements into more specific and motivational ways to measure results?
 
Pennies Lead To Profits, Dollars Lead To More Profits
In an industry where dollars of sales only produce a few pennies of profit, do you honestly believe that measuring bottom line results on a weekly and monthly basis, and only in a manner that hasn’t been improved in almost a century, is adequate? I don’t think so! Give these ideas some thought and then consider how much information coming from your front-end and accounting systems are being used, and how much is going to waste. Remember, if we don’t actually use the information that comes out of the POS system, we might as well use a cigar box.